JOURNAL ARTICLE
Does a Jury Need to Have 12 Members?
Published In: Time.com, 2025. P. N.PAG 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Su, Wanling 3 of 3
Abstract
The article focuses on the historical and constitutional significance of the 12-person jury in American trial law, highlighting the Supreme Court case Parada v. United States, which may reinstate the 12-juror requirement. It explains that the founders explicitly valued 12 jurors as essential to a legitimate trial, contrasting this with historical practices in "slave courts" where fewer jurors signified denial of constitutional protections. The article cites 18th-century legal authorities and state court rulings affirming that a jury of fewer than 12 was not considered a true jury, emphasizing that the number 12 was integral to the concept of a fair trial. The discussion challenges the 1970 Supreme Court decision that allowed smaller juries, arguing that historical evidence shows the founders intended a fixed jury size to ensure community representation and due process.
Additional Information
- Source:Time.com. 2025/12, pN.PAG
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:2476-2679
- Accession Number:190297404
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Time.com is the property of TIME USA, LLC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.