JOURNAL ARTICLE

Duty of Noninjury, Duty of Care, and Guidance Rules: A Comment on Recognizing Wrongs.

  • Published In: Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, 2023, v. 27, n. 1. P. 51 1 of 3

  • Database: Legal Source 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Gilboa, Maytal 3 of 3

Abstract

The duty of noninjury represents a conception of duty, under which although the wrongdoing and the injury appear to be separate, they are the essence of what G&Z describe as "integrated wrongs." This view of tortious wrongs, G&Z explain, provides a coherent understanding of what unifies I all i torts, based on a relation between one person holding a right not to be injured and another under a duty not to injure (RW, 186-87). In I Recognizing Wrongs i ,[1] Goldberg and Zipursky (G&Z) provide a remarkable scholarly explanation of tort law, depicting torts as breaches of a duty of noninjury, civilly actionable by their victims (RW, 30, 198). [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies. 2023/06, Vol. 27, Issue 1, p51
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:22197125
  • DOI:10.1093/jrls/jlad004
  • Accession Number:164367713
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.