JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cutting the Gerrymander Knot.

  • Published In: National Review, 2026, v. 78, n. 7. P. 22 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: McLAUGHLIN, DAN 3 of 3

Abstract

The article focuses on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which prohibits the routine use of race in drawing legislative district lines to preserve "majority-minority" districts. It explains that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) does not explicitly require racially segregated districts and emphasizes equal openness to political participation rather than guaranteed racial representation. The ruling places partisan gerrymandering by both parties on equal legal footing and may encourage bipartisan negotiations on redistricting reforms, such as enforcing compactness and congruence in district boundaries. The article also discusses the political dynamics influencing gerrymandering debates and the challenges of balancing racial representation with race-neutral districting criteria. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:National Review. 2026/07, Vol. 78, Issue 7, p22
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2026
  • ISSN:0028-0038
  • Accession Number:193730660
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of National Review is the property of National Review Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.