How Originalism Killed the Constitution.
Published In: Atlantic, 2025, v. 336, n. 4. P. 20 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: LEPORE, JILL 3 of 3
Abstract
The article examines the impact of Antonin Scalia's originalist philosophy on the U.S. Constitution and the process of constitutional amendment. It argues that Scalia's belief that the Constitution is a "dead" document has contributed to a stagnation in the amendment process, with only 27 amendments ratified since its inception, and no significant changes in over 50 years. The piece highlights the historical context of constitutional amendments, the rise of originalism as a judicial philosophy, and the increasing polarization of American politics, particularly surrounding issues like abortion and gun rights. Ultimately, it suggests that the failure to amend the Constitution reflects a broader crisis in American constitutionalism, exacerbated by the politicization of the Supreme Court and the challenges of contemporary governance. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Atlantic. 2025/10, Vol. 336, Issue 4, p20
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:1072-7825
- Accession Number:187710803
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Atlantic is the property of Atlantic Monthly Group LLC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.