Back

TO MATCH A PREDATOR.

  • Published In: Mother Jones, 2023, v. 48, n. 5. P. 36 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: VESOULIS, ABBY 3 of 3

Abstract

FEATURES MATTHEW HERRICK'S dating profiles depicted a muscular man with olive-green eyes and red-hot bedroom interests. Match Group, for example, argued in an amicus brief it submitted in Matthew Herrick's case against Grindr that companies like theirs might "cease to exist altogether" without it. Two other gay dating apps took swift action to remove fake profiles, Herrick says.) In 2017, as Herrick pursued criminal charges against Gutierrez, he also sued Grindr. But their passage, paired with the judicial system's increased acceptance of product liability arguments in tech cases and international efforts to increase enforcement power against online platforms, suggests tech companies may soon be more vulnerable to civil claims than they were when Herrick took Grindr to court. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Mother Jones. 2023/09, Vol. 48, Issue 5, p36
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0362-8841
  • Accession Number:169693227
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Mother Jones is the property of Foundation for National Progress and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.