Garner the Grammarian.

  • Published In: National Review, 2025, v. 77, n. 8. P. 66 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: GARNER, BRYAN A. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses the concept of originalism in legal interpretation, emphasizing the importance of understanding historical texts and traditions in judicial decision-making. It highlights Justice Antonin Scalia's belief that judges should interpret the Constitution based on its text rather than personal value judgments, using examples to illustrate potential misinterpretations of legal language. The piece also touches on the terminology surrounding constitutional interpretation, contrasting "originalism" with the "living Constitution" concept, and recounts a conversation where Scalia reconsidered his approach to discussing the Constitution's nature. The article ultimately underscores the significance of clarity and accuracy in legal interpretation to avoid distortions in judicial outcomes. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:National Review. 2025/08, Vol. 77, Issue 8, p66
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0028-0038
  • Accession Number:185887516
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of National Review is the property of National Review Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.