Explaining sex discrepancies in sterilization rates in the United States: An evidence‐informed commentary.
Published In: Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health, 2023, v. 55, n. 3. P. 116 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Mock, K. Olivia; Moyer, Anne; Lobel, Marci 3 of 3
Abstract
Context: With abortion no longer deemed a constitutional right in the United States (US), the importance of effective contraceptive methods cannot be overstated. Both male sterilization (vasectomy) and female sterilization (tubal ligation) have the lowest failure rates of available means of contraception. Despite the less invasive and reversible nature of vasectomy compared to tubal ligation procedures and even though some healthcare professionals dissuade certain women, especially those who are white and/or economically advantaged, from undergoing a sterilization procedure, female sterilization is approximately three times more prevalent than male sterilization in the US. Purpose: We suggest that the discrepancy in sterilization rates is attributable to the burdens of pregnancy and birth experienced by women, beliefs that pregnancy prevention is a woman's responsibility, a dearth of sex education that results in lack of knowledge and poor understanding of contraception, perceptions of masculinity in which contraception is viewed as feminizing, and the increase in long‐term singlehood that shapes the desire of individuals to avoid unwanted pregnancy that may result in single parenting. Implications: Recent reports suggest that court rulings restricting abortion access and looming threats to contraceptive legality and accessibility may be prompting a national increase in male sterilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health. 2023/09, Vol. 55, Issue 3, p116
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:1538-6341
- DOI:10.1363/psrh.12243
- Accession Number:171999519
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.