JOURNAL ARTICLE

PURPA Jurisdictional Questions Continue to Perplex.

  • Published In: Natural Resources & Environment, 2025, v. 39, n. 4. P. 50 1 of 3

  • Database: Environment Complete 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Grover, Scott B. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article focuses on the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) and its implications for the development of cogeneration and small power production facilities. Specifically, it discusses section 210, which mandates that electric utilities sell and purchase electricity from qualifying facilities (QFs) and outlines the judicial review processes available for enforcing these rules. The article highlights the complexities arising from the dual enforcement mechanisms—state and federal courts—and the ongoing confusion regarding jurisdiction, particularly in cases involving retail electricity sales. It suggests that recent actions by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may indicate a shift towards federal jurisdiction, despite historical precedent favoring state-level resolution. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Natural Resources & Environment. 2025/04, Vol. 39, Issue 4, p50
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0882-3812
  • Accession Number:186858121
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Natural Resources & Environment is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.