JOURNAL ARTICLE
In the name of help: Anti-interracial marriage discourse in China and the intersection of racial discrimination, patriarchy, and nationalism.
Published In: European Journal of Cultural Studies, 2025, v. 28, n. 6. P. 1570 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: He, Renyi; Xu, Manxin 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines how the concept of "help" on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu was used in a nationalist, racial, and gendered discourse to oppose a young Chinese woman's interracial marriage to a Nigerian man. Through qualitative content and critical discourse analysis of user comments, the study reveals that the purported assistance offered by Chinese netizens was rooted in anti-Black racial stereotypes, patriarchal assumptions, and nationalist ideals that framed the woman as dependent and in need of protection. The discourse emphasized Chinese national solidarity while implicitly denigrating Africa and African people, thereby reinforcing racial hierarchies and traditional gender roles. The study highlights how such "help," framed as care and goodwill, functioned as a mechanism of subtle discrimination that undermined the woman's autonomy and perpetuated intersecting oppressions within the Chinese sociopolitical context.
Additional Information
- Source:European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2025/12, Vol. 28, Issue 6, p1570
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:1367-5494
- DOI:10.1177/13675494251316118
- Accession Number:189505881
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of European Journal of Cultural Studies is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.