JOURNAL ARTICLE

Subpoenas Upheld in Attorney Extortion Case.

  • Published In: Litigation News, 2025, v. 50, n. 4. P. 26 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Marchese, Jeffrey M. 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses a federal court of appeals' rejection of an interlocutory appeal concerning grand jury subpoenas issued to a Maryland attorney accused of extorting a hospital. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit determined that certain discovery privileges did not apply and that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal, emphasizing that the matter should be addressed after the attorney's criminal case concludes. The attorney, who had filed a medical malpractice lawsuit, allegedly demanded $50 million from the hospital, threatening to create an "internet bomb" if his demands were not met. The court found that the attorney-client privilege was waived and that the crime-fraud exception applied to the work-product privilege, allowing for the discovery of materials related to the alleged criminal conduct. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Litigation News. 2025/07, Vol. 50, Issue 4, p26
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Law
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0147-9970
  • Accession Number:187987041
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Litigation News is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.