Recognising the rights of nature: How have the courts fared?

The Rights of Nature (RoN) concept is an evolving theory in environmental law. It advocates that natural objects be respected and allowed to exist, thrive and flourish for themselves and not for utilitarian purposes. However, attempts to apply the rights often result in litigation. The outcomes of these cases have grave implications for the impact of the RoN concept on the development of jurisprudence and environmental protection, which will further determine its acceptance or rejection by the international community. An examination of some key cases reveals some positive developments that can enhance the implementation of the concept, but it also demonstrates that there are some challenges in the approach adopted by the courts. The article concludes that the RoN can be a jurisprudential tool to enhance environmental protection only where, in addition to well‐written constitutional and legislative provisions, court decisions in these cases are of practical consequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]