JOURNAL ARTICLE
An account of the negotiations inside the Parlement de Paris: Claude Guillaume Lambert's diary.
Published In: French History, 2023, v. 37, n. 2. P. 111 1 of 3
Database: Historical Abstracts with Full Text 2 of 3
Authored By: Guffroy, Vincent 3 of 3
Abstract
The article focuses on the diary of Claude Guillaume II Lambert, a mid-18th-century councillor of the Parlement de Paris, which provides rare insight into the internal debates, factional dynamics, and political strategies within this sovereign court between 1749 and 1751. Lambert’s diary reveals the parlement’s dual judicial and administrative roles, its use of majority voting, and the complex interplay between magistrates who either supported royal authority or opposed it, particularly during disputes over taxation such as the vingtième and religious controversies involving the clergy and Jansenists. The diary illustrates the parlement as a political arena where magistrates negotiated their constitutionalist claims, balancing service to the monarchy with defense of perceived public and institutional interests, and highlights the gradual radicalization of opposition leading up to the parlement’s exile in 1753. This source challenges previous views of the parlement as a monolithic opposition and instead portrays it as a fragmented but politically engaged body navigating the tensions of royal absolutism and emerging public opinion.
Additional Information
- Source:French History. 2023/06, Vol. 37, Issue 2, p111
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Law
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0269-1191
- DOI:10.1093/fh/crac056
- Accession Number:170020685
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of French History is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.