JOURNAL ARTICLE
Love as Contaminant: A Xenobiotic Reading of Desire and Decay in Phaedra's Love.
Published In: Journal of Contemporary Drama in English, 2025, v. 13, n. 2. P. 346 1 of 3
Database: International Bibliography of Theatre & Dance with Full Text 2 of 3
Authored By: Salami, Ali 3 of 3
Abstract
This article reconsiders the affective architecture of Sarah Kane's Phaedra's Love (1996) through the lens of xenobiotic intimacy, a framework drawn from posthumanist ecocriticism and toxicity studies, wherein love is not plenitude or lack but a contaminant. Love is not a pharmakon nor cathartic residue, but a slow-acting biological insurgent. In Kane's tragic ecology, it corrodes rather than heals, destabilizing the skin envelope of the self and leaking into porous membranes between desire and death. Phaedra's relation to Hippolytus is metastatic: a mutually pathogenic intimacy accruing like waste – chemically unstable, ecologically unlivable. Kane does not revise tragedy; she decomposes it. What remains is not a purified ruin, but a theatrical toxicology of feeling, where love signals not transcendence but systemic collapse. Bodies are not represented but disarticulated, rendered vulnerable to saturation, exposure, decay. This reading situates Kane within affective materialism and ecological temporalities, tracing love as a xenobiotic force that unsettles the anthropocentric ground of passion. In Phaedra's Love, love is neither inside nor outside the body but entangled in its necrobiotic processes, echoing late-capitalist ecologies of leakage, exhaustion, and irrevocable exposure. Intimacy, in Kane's theatre, is no longer redemptive, but a form of metabolized – yet unassimilable – slow violence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Contemporary Drama in English. 2025/11, Vol. 13, Issue 2, p346
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Literature and Writing
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:2195-0156
- DOI:10.1515/jcde-2025-2027
- Accession Number:189204886
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Contemporary Drama in English is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.