JOURNAL ARTICLE

Immanuel Kant's Anthropology and Ernest Gellner's Critique of the Modern Social Sciences.

  • Published In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2025, v. 55, n. 4. P. 309 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Reichert, Roey 3 of 3

Abstract

This article examines the significant influence of Immanuel Kant's philosophical anthropology on Ernest Gellner's social theory, focusing on how Kant’s effort to preserve human agency amid mechanistic explanations of nature shaped Gellner’s critique of the social sciences. Key Kantian concepts such as the "exception," disenchantment, and mechanical dehumanization are traced through Gellner’s work, who historicized Kant’s universal claims and introduced the notion of the "Rubber Cage" to describe modern society’s tension between scientific rationality and the human need for meaning. Gellner expanded Kant’s insights by emphasizing the historically specific nature of modernity’s epistemic and moral dilemmas, highlighting the social sciences’ potential to dehumanize by reducing individuals to impersonal data. The Kantian-Gellnerian framework remains relevant for contemporary social sciences, underscoring the ongoing challenge of balancing rigorous scientific inquiry with the preservation of human dignity and agency.

Additional Information

  • Source:Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2025/07, Vol. 55, Issue 4, p309
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Literature and Writing
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0048-3931
  • DOI:10.1177/00483931251327325
  • Accession Number:185307300
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Philosophy of the Social Sciences is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.