JOURNAL ARTICLE

VERGIL'S EPICUREAN FORTUNATUS.

  • Published In: Classical Journal, 2023, v. 118, n. 4. P. 409 1 of 3

  • Database: Art Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: TROTZ-LIBOFF, LEO 3 of 3

Abstract

In this paper I reevaluate the relationship between the figures of the felix and the fortunatus at the end of Georgics Book 2. Rather than representing an opposition between Epicurean natural philosophy and traditional religion, the figures are complementary, embodying the physical and ethical teachings of Epicureanism respectively. I first discuss the implications of Vergil's praise of the felix for his views on traditional religion and analyze allusions to Lucretius in his description of the fortunatus. Then I show that Vergil's treatment of the divine both has parallels to Epicurean cult practice and follows Lucretius' poetic model of divine symbolism, the divinities named at 2.494 being symbols for Epicurean ethical ideals. As a whole, my argument indicates a positive attitude towards Epicureanism in the Georgics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Classical Journal. 2023/06, Vol. 118, Issue 4, p409
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Literature and Writing
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0009-8353
  • DOI:10.1353/tcj.2023.0010
  • Accession Number:163056030
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Classical Journal is the property of Johns Hopkins University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.