JOURNAL ARTICLE

Struggling toward Empathic Witness in Blood Meridian.

  • Published In: Studies in the Novel, 2025, v. 57, n. 1. P. 61 1 of 3

  • Database: Sociology Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Shear, Ricky 3 of 3

Abstract

Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian is often understood as a novel whose externalist narration, reprehensible characters, and extreme violence reject empathy. This essay draws on cognitive literary studies to argue that, rather than rejecting empathy, Blood Meridian strains productively against normative relationships between reader, novel, and empathy, relationships typically defined by comfort or seduction, to call readers to practice difficult empathy. By leaving characters' minds unnarrated, the novel creates a barrier to easy empathy and an opportunity for ambiguous, effortful empathic imagining. This externalist narration works in concert with the novel's conception of witnessing, which asserts the ethical stakes of attending to others' inner lives by suggesting that witnessing others with empathy enables one to "poison" Judge Holden's enterprise of violence. Embracing the novel's invitation to empathic witness equips readers to testify to the value of others' lives and to empathy's enduring ethical potential amid a culture of exploitation and war. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Studies in the Novel. 2025/03, Vol. 57, Issue 1, p61
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Literature and Writing
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0039-3827
  • DOI:10.1353/sdn.2025.a952391
  • Accession Number:183605042
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Studies in the Novel is the property of Johns Hopkins University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.