JOURNAL ARTICLE

Foucauldian critical thinking: An antithesis to technicization.

  • Published In: Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2024, v. 58, n. 6. P. 910 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Li, Yulong; Liu, Xiaojing 3 of 3

Abstract

This article critically examines the prevailing conception of critical thinking (CT) as a set of transferable skills, arguing that this skill-oriented view results from a broader neoliberal discourse that technicizes CT. Using Michel Foucault's theories on discourse, human capital, and biopower, the article traces how international organizations, governments, media, and educational institutions promote skill- and competence-based education aligned with neoliberal market logics, thereby shaping individuals as entrepreneurial "homo economicus." It further situates this technicization within the historical context of Enlightenment rationality and its paradoxical "dark side," where scientific bureaucracy and technological rationality impose control and diminish genuine criticality. The article proposes a Foucauldian alternative conception of critical thinking as an art of critique—"the art of not being governed"—emphasizing self-care and fearless speech as practices to resist dominant power-knowledge structures and reclaim subjectivity.

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2024/12, Vol. 58, Issue 6, p910
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Literature and Writing
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0309-8249
  • DOI:10.1093/jopedu/qhae058
  • Accession Number:181970770
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Philosophy of Education is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.