JOURNAL ARTICLE
Improving clinical abbreviation sense disambiguation using attention‐based Bi‐LSTM and hybrid balancing techniques in imbalanced datasets.
Published In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2024, v. 30, n. 7. P. 1327 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Hosseini, Manda; Rasekh, Amir Hossein; Keshavarzi, Amin 3 of 3
Abstract
Rationale: Clinical abbreviations pose a challenge for clinical decision support systems due to their ambiguity. Additionally, clinical datasets often suffer from class imbalance, hindering the classification of such data. This imbalance leads to classifiers with low accuracy and high error rates. Traditional feature‐engineered models struggle with this task, and class imbalance is a known factor that reduces the performance of neural network techniques. Aims and Objectives: This study proposes an attention‐based bidirectional long short‐term memory (Bi‐LSTM) model to improve clinical abbreviation disambiguation in clinical documents. We aim to address the challenges of limited training data and class imbalance by employing data generation techniques like reverse substitution and data augmentation with synonym substitution. Method: We utilise a Bi‐LSTM classification model with an attention mechanism to disambiguate each abbreviation. The model's performance is evaluated based on accuracy for each abbreviation. To address the limitations of imbalanced data, we employ data generation techniques to create a more balanced dataset. Results: The evaluation results demonstrate that our data balancing technique significantly improves the model's accuracy by 2.08%. Furthermore, the proposed attention‐based Bi‐LSTM model achieves an accuracy of 96.09% on the UMN dataset, outperforming state‐of‐the‐art results. Conclusion: Deep neural network methods, particularly Bi‐LSTM, offer promising alternatives to traditional feature‐engineered models for clinical abbreviation disambiguation. By employing data generation techniques, we can address the challenges posed by limited‐resource and imbalanced clinical datasets. This approach leads to a significant improvement in model accuracy for clinical abbreviation disambiguation tasks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2024/10, Vol. 30, Issue 7, p1327
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Literature and Writing
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:1356-1294
- DOI:10.1111/jep.14041
- Accession Number:179878321
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.