JOURNAL ARTICLE

The hero fallacy paradox: Cognitive dissonance and the rationalization of political violence.

  • Published In: Sociology Compass, 2023, v. 17, n. 3. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Sociology Source Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Pope, Paul James 3 of 3

Abstract

This research explores the theoretical underpinnings of the expressed hero narrative utilized by groups and individuals to justify their opposition and use of violence against their own government and citizens. By using narrative analysis, this research deconstructs the language used by the groups and individuals involved in the 6 January 2021, attack on the United States Capitol. What emerges is a theory of self‐radicalization and rationalization where one believes their actions are justified because they perceive themselves to be the hero. Their belief and ideology are built on a foundation of cognitive dissonance, in which they construct a paradoxical hero identity, all while engaged in destructive political violence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Sociology Compass. 2023/03, Vol. 17, Issue 3, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Literature and Writing
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:1751-9020
  • DOI:10.1111/soc4.13062
  • Accession Number:162203234
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Sociology Compass is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.