JOURNAL ARTICLE

The pitch range of L2 English read by native speakers of Jordanian Arabic compared with that of L1 speakers of English and Arabic.

  • Published In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025, v. 157, n. 4. P. 2505 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Bani Younes, Mohammad Ali Salah; Hirst, Daniel; Alzaidi, Muhammad Swaileh A.; AlAqlobi, Obied 3 of 3

Abstract

This study investigates differences in pitch range—the interval between highest and lowest pitch—in English produced by native Jordanian Arabic speakers (L2 English) compared to native English speakers (L1 English) and native Arabic speakers (L1 Arabic). Using recordings of 12 Jordanian participants reading the same text in both languages and comparing them with 12 native British English speakers from the IViE Corpus, the study found that L2 English exhibits a significantly narrower pitch span than L1 English. Notably, the pitch ranges of L1 Arabic and L2 English were strikingly similar, suggesting a negative cross-linguistic transfer (interference) from Arabic to English rather than an independent interlanguage pattern. These findings support Mennen's L2 Intonation Learning Theory's "realisational dimension" and contribute to understanding how native language prosody influences second language intonation acquisition.

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2025/04, Vol. 157, Issue 4, p2505
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Music
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0001-4966
  • DOI:10.1121/10.0036364
  • Accession Number:184883963
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of the Acoustical Society of America is the property of American Institute of Physics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.