JOURNAL ARTICLE

Adaptation and Validation of a Moral Distress Instrument in Mental Health Nurses.

  • Published In: Journal of Nursing Measurement, 2024, v. 32, n. 3. P. 434 1 of 3

  • Database: CINAHL Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Bruggmann, Mario Sergio; Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni; Souza Ramos, Flávia Regina; Vargas, Mara Ambrosina; Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti de Farias; Bhering, Ácmon 3 of 3

Abstract

Background and Purpose: To adapt and validate the Brazilian Scale of Moral Distress in Nurses for the mental health field. Methods: A cross-sectional methodological study was carried out, adapted with the contribution of 34 specialists, and validated by 173 mental health nurses. Results: The validated scale consists of 37 items divided into seven factors, and they were responsible for 77.2% of variance—working conditions, advocacy for the values and rights, professional safety and autonomy, ethical violations, social conflicts, ethical–professional competence, and conflicts with the management, with coefficient α at.972 for the entire instrument, and ranging from.852 to.949 for the constructs. Conclusion: The results provide evidence that the adapted instrument is reliable, valid, and consistent in measuring moral distress in mental health nurses.

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2024/09, Vol. 32, Issue 3, p434
  • Document Type:Journal Article
  • Subject Area:Nursing and Allied Health
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:1061-3749
  • DOI:10.1891/JNM-2023-0016
  • Accession Number:180475018

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.