Back

A numbers game.

  • Published In: New Scientist, 2025, v. 268, n. 3565. P. 40 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Kwan, Jacklin 3 of 3

Abstract

The article explores a long-standing debate among physicists regarding the number of fundamental constants necessary to describe reality. The discussion originated in 1992 among three physicists—Gabriele Veneziano, Lev Okun, and Michael Duff—who proposed differing views on whether two, three, or even zero constants are essential. Traditionally, three constants— the speed of light (c), Planck's constant (h), and the gravitational constant (G)—have been considered foundational in physics, linking key concepts of relativity, quantum mechanics, and gravity. Recent research by George Matsas and colleagues suggests that only one constant, related to time measurement, may be necessary, highlighting the ongoing complexity and philosophical implications of defining the universe's fundamental nature. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:New Scientist. 2025/10, Vol. 268, Issue 3565, p40
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Physics
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0262-4079
  • DOI:10.1016/s0262-4079(25)01718-x
  • Accession Number:188663211
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of New Scientist is the property of New Scientist Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.