JOURNAL ARTICLE
Breaking the Filibuster.
Published In: National Review, 2026, v. 78, n. 6. P. 18 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: FAHLBERG, AUDREY 3 of 3
Abstract
The article focuses on Senate Republicans' resistance to President Trump's repeated efforts to eliminate the filibuster, a Senate rule requiring a 60-vote threshold to advance legislation. Despite Trump's persistent calls to end the filibuster—viewed by him and some allies as an outdated obstacle to legislative progress—most Senate Republicans remain opposed, fearing political backlash and institutional damage if they abolish the rule first. The White House has conducted only limited outreach to gauge support rather than mounting a full lobbying campaign, reflecting skepticism about the actual number of senators willing to vote for change. The debate also highlights intra-GOP divisions over alternative filibuster reforms, such as the "talking filibuster," and concerns about the political and procedural consequences of altering Senate traditions amid ongoing partisan conflicts. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:National Review. 2026/06, Vol. 78, Issue 6, p18
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Political Science
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:0028-0038
- Accession Number:193018433
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of National Review is the property of National Review Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.