JOURNAL ARTICLE
Meritocratic Myth in Mind? Socioeconomic Backgrounds and Shifting Beliefs about Meritocracy among College Students in China.
Published In: Sociology of Education, 2026, v. 99, n. 1. P. 40 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Tang, Minghao; Li, Angran; Wu, Xiaogang 3 of 3
Abstract
This article examines how Chinese college students' beliefs in meritocracy—defined as the idea that success is based on individual talent, effort, and education—change over their college years and vary by socioeconomic status (SES). Using longitudinal data from the Beijing College Students Panel Survey (BCSPS), the study finds that students' overall belief in meritocracy declines during college as they increasingly recognize the importance of nonmeritocratic factors such as family background and social connections. Students from lower-SES backgrounds initially hold stronger meritocratic beliefs and downplay nonmeritocratic influences, but over time their views converge with those of higher-SES peers, who are more aware of structural advantages from the outset. These findings highlight a "dual consciousness" among students who simultaneously endorse meritocratic ideals while acknowledging systemic inequalities, illustrating how higher education shapes perceptions of social mobility differently across socioeconomic groups in China.
Additional Information
- Source:Sociology of Education. 2026/01, Vol. 99, Issue 1, p40
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Political Science
- Publication Date:2026
- ISSN:0038-0407
- DOI:10.1177/00380407251360432
- Accession Number:190512086
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Sociology of Education is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.