Back

The paradox of AI accelerationism and the promise of public interest AI.

  • Published In: Science, 2025, v. 390, n. 6768. P. N.PAG 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Okolo, Chinasa T. 3 of 3

Abstract

Over the past 3 years, the idea that artificial intelligence (AI) development should be accelerated without restraint to drive radical societal change—a phenomenon known as AI accelerationism—has gained traction in Silicon Valley. The most prominent form of this belief is known as "effective accelerationism," and adherents view unrestricted progress in AI as a solution to humanity's problems. Rooted in the broader political ideology of accelerationism, this movement positions itself directly in opposition to "AI doomers" or "decelerationists," who advocate for AI safety and slow, cautious development. Effective accelerationists often dismiss concerns about existential risk, arguing that technological stagnation is a greater danger than uncontrolled advancement. Public interest AI inverts AI accelerationism, promoting more equitable, sustainable, and democratically accountable technological progress. This approach directly addresses the risks and potential harms of unregulated acceleration by aligning AI with public values rather than solely with private interests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Science. 2025/10, Vol. 390, Issue 6768, pN.PAG
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Political Science
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0036-8075
  • DOI:10.1126/science.aeb5789
  • Accession Number:188431550
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.