Policies for recovery from drug use: Differences between public stigma and perceived stigma and associated factors.
Published In: Drug & Alcohol Review, 2024, v. 43, n. 4. P. 861 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Luo, Tingyu; Xu, Shuping; Zhang, Kun 3 of 3
Abstract
Introduction: Public stigma towards people who use drugs is widespread and places obstacles in way of their recovery. Previous studies have used different approaches to measure public stigma, resulting in a notable gap in the understanding of the relationship between it and its associated factors. Some studies measure public stigma by assessing stigma perceived by those who use drugs, while others investigate attitudes towards them among the general public. This study aimed to compare perceived and public stigma, and factors related to these two variables. Methods: The study comprised a cross‐sectional survey in China of two samples: males who used drugs (N = 257) and the general public (N = 376). The survey assessed demographic variables, social distance, public stigma and perceived stigma of those who use drugs. The data were analysed using t‐tests and linear regression. Results: Public stigma was significantly higher than perceived stigma. The findings indicated that gender, knowledge of drugs, family relationships with people who use drugs, attributions of drug use and social distance were significantly related to levels of public stigma. Among those who use drugs, perceived stigma was significantly correlated with age, marital status, duration of drug abstinence and social distance. Discussion and Conclusions: Findings indicate that public stigma undermines the recovery of people who use drugs and highlight the importance of interaction between them and the social environment. The study also underscores the necessity of developing policies to enhance their integration into mainstream culture and provide access to social support and life activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Drug & Alcohol Review. 2024/05, Vol. 43, Issue 4, p861
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Political Science
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0959-5236
- DOI:10.1111/dar.13818
- Accession Number:176869995
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Drug & Alcohol Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.