JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Supreme Court's Decision on Affirmative Action Must Not Be the Final Word.

  • Published In: Time.com, 2023. P. 1 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Johnson, Olatunde 3 of 3

Abstract

The article discusses the implications of the Supreme Court's recent rulings in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard University and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, which limit the consideration of race and ethnicity in university admissions. The decisions are viewed as a setback for affirmative action programs that have historically aided students of color in accessing higher education. Despite this legal limitation, the article emphasizes the ongoing responsibility of educational institutions to address racial and ethnic inequalities in education, citing the 14th Amendment and Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act as frameworks for promoting equity. The author argues that improving educational access requires collective action and a commitment to dismantling inequitable structures, regardless of the Supreme Court's stance. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Time.com. 2023/06, p1
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Politics and Government
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:2476-2679
  • Accession Number:164601428
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Time.com is the property of TIME USA, LLC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.