Back

The myth of regaining control: Ostracism increases superstitious tendencies.

  • Published In: British Journal of Psychology, 2023, v. 114, n. 1. P. 209 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Poon, Kai‐Tak; Wong, Natalie Hiu‐Lam; Lai, Hill‐Son; Jiang, Yufei 3 of 3

Abstract

Whether and how interpersonal experiences predispose people to show superstitious tendencies have been largely unexamined by past studies. By adopting a multimethod approach, three studies tested (a) whether ostracism increases superstitious tendencies through thwarted perceived control, (b) whether the dispositional need for closure moderates the effect of ostracism on superstitious tendencies and (c) whether restoring ostracized people's thwarted control weakens their superstitious tendencies. The results revealed that ostracized participants had higher superstitious tendencies than nonostracized participants did (Studies 1–3). Moreover, thwarted control mediated the effect of ostracism on superstitious tendencies (Study 2). In addition, the dispositional need for closure moderated the effect of ostracism on superstitious tendencies, such that the effect was stronger among participants with a high need for closure (Studies 1–2). Finally, restoring ostracized participants' perceived control weakened the effect of ostracism on superstitious tendencies (Study 3). Altogether, these findings feature the essential role of thwarted perceived control in understanding the link between ostracism and superstitious tendencies and the implication of control restoration in weakening the link. They also highlight the importance of dispositional characteristics in moderating people's responses to superstitions following ostracism and related forms of interpersonal maltreatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:British Journal of Psychology. 2023/02, Vol. 114, Issue 1, p209
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Psychology
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:0007-1269
  • DOI:10.1111/bjop.12606
  • Accession Number:161180776
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of British Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.