Loneliness is associated with a greater self‐reference effect in episodic memory when compared against a close friend.
Published In: British Journal of Psychology, 2023, v. 114, n. 3. P. 731 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Kokici, Laureta; Chirtop, Gratiela; Ferguson, Heather J.; Martin, Andrew K. 3 of 3
Abstract
Loneliness describes a negative experience associated with perceived social disconnection. Despite the clear links between loneliness and mental and physical health, relatively little is known about how loneliness affects cognition. In this study, we tested the effect of loneliness on cognitive distance between the self and others, using a task in which participants completed a surprise memory task for adjectives implicitly encoded in relation to the self, a close friend or a celebrity. We assessed item memory sensitivity, metacognitive sensitivity, metacognitive efficiency and source memory for positive and negative words. In addition, participants reported their trait loneliness and depression. Results revealed an overall self‐referential advantage compared with both friend and celebrity encoded items. Likewise, a friend‐referential advantage was identified compared to celebrity‐encoded items. Individuals who experienced more loneliness showed a greater self‐referential bias in comparison to words encoded in relation to a close friend, and a smaller friend‐referential bias in comparison to words encoded in relation to celebrity. These findings suggest that loneliness is reflected in a greater cognitive distance between the self and close friends in relation to memory biases. The results have important implications for understanding the social contextual effects on memory and the cognitive ramifications of loneliness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:British Journal of Psychology. 2023/08, Vol. 114, Issue 3, p731
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Psychology
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0007-1269
- DOI:10.1111/bjop.12646
- Accession Number:164879265
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of British Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.