From Stigma to Support: "Black-Owned" Labels and Expertise Stereotypes in Cannabis and Psychedelics Markets.

  • Published In: Journal of Consumer Research, 2026, v. 52, n. 5. P. 1000 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Achar, Chethana; Agrawal, Nidhi; Lock, Keyaira 3 of 3

Abstract

We examine the effect of "Black-owned" labeling on cannabis and psychedelic brands, in context of the stigmatized and risky nature of the drugs category. Building on prior studies examining social justice or discrimination, we introduce an expertise stereotype framework. As study 1, we surveyed 37 Black professionals in the drugs industry about expectations regarding "Black-owned" labels, as juxtaposition to consumer responses in the following studies. In study 2, we measured expertise stereotypes about Black and women entrepreneurs across various product types. Utilizing these findings, we contrasted the effect of "Black-owned" labels on cannabis versus candy products in study 3. "Black-owned" labeling increased Black participants' intentions to consume candy, but not cannabis; and the pattern reversed for White participants such that "Black-owned" labeling increased their intentions only for cannabis. Whereas out-group members' response is consistent with expertise stereotypes, in-group members' support does not extend to the stigmatized category. In study 4, field ad campaigns revealed that "Black-owned" (vs. no) label increases click-through by 21% on a psychedelics ad, while a "Woman-owned" (vs. no) label reduces by 15%, consistent with expertise stereotypes. These findings advance the discourse on ownership labeling and provide insight into nuanced consumer responses in this category. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Consumer Research. 2026/02, Vol. 52, Issue 5, p1000
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Psychology
  • Publication Date:2026
  • ISSN:0093-5301
  • DOI:10.1093/jcr/ucaf022
  • Accession Number:191385612
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Consumer Research is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.