Blind Love, Risky Romance: Exposure to Romantic Cues Increases Nonmoral and Immoral Risk Taking.

  • Published In: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2025, v. 66, n. 3. P. 446 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Li, Heng 3 of 3

Abstract

Love and risk are often intricately intertwined within linguistic and cultural conventions. This study experimentally tested the hypothesis that risk‐taking attitudes and behaviors are systematically influenced by romantic primes. To evaluate our theoretical framework, we conducted four complementary experiments utilizing various priming techniques (lexical cues, advertisements, and storytelling), diverse participant populations (students and general adults), and multiple measures of risk‐taking behavior (self‐report and behavioral data). Study 1 compared students' tendencies to engage in risk taking when exposed to romantic cues versus neutral primes. Studies 2 and 3 aimed to provide behavioral confirmation of the observed effects in nonmoral and immoral risk‐taking behaviors among nonstudent participants. Study 4 sought to provide more direct evidence regarding the role of self‐control in explaining the effects of romantic cues on risk taking. We found both correlational and experimental evidence indicating that participants primed with romantic cues exhibited a higher likelihood of engaging in nonmoral and immoral risk‐taking behaviors compared to those exposed to neutral conditions. Across the studies, self‐control was identified as a mediating factor in the observed effects. In sum, our research demonstrates that the mere presence of romantic themes significantly influences the propensity to engage in risky behaviors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2025/06, Vol. 66, Issue 3, p446
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Psychology
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0036-5564
  • DOI:10.1111/sjop.13096
  • Accession Number:184867966
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.