Revisiting Health Security Governance: The Korean Biosurveillance Regime from Biopolitics to Biocitizenship.

The South Korean COVID-19 pandemic response implemented a new biosurveillance regime actively utilizing new information and communication technology (ICT) and digital tools, centered on the testing, tracing, and treating (3T) strategy. Critics argue that Korea's 3T strategy may violate individuals' privacy and human rights. According to Foucauldian perspectives, implementing a strict regime of this nature would bolster the government's social surveillance capabilities and enable population control, effectively establishing a "digital big brother" in the age of cyberspace. However, Western media highlights the citizen's voluntary participation in biosurveillance practices as well as the successful national election during the pandemic, praising it as a new pandemic response model for democratic countries. Closer scrutiny reveals that Korea's digital-based biosurveillance system for pandemic response has evolved since the experience with the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak, by citizens' requests and self-help behaviors. The biocitizenship framework's bottom-up approach offers a more robust explanation for the emergence of new biosurveillance in Korea in the context of health security, as opposed to the top-down approach of biopolitics. This article's case study illustrates how the post-MERS digital biosurveillance in Korea serves as a new model of biocitizenship establishing governmental discipline by social compromise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]