We have positive epistemic duties.

The article explores the concept of positive epistemic duties, arguing that individuals have obligations to believe certain propositions based on the evidence available to them. It distinguishes between simple, compound, and disjunctive positive duties, similar to moral duties, and posits that these duties can exist even when individuals do not fully appreciate the strength of their evidence. The author critiques existing philosophical arguments against the existence of positive epistemic duties, particularly those grounded in Evidentialism, and presents cases where individuals should revise their beliefs upon acquiring counterevidence. Ultimately, the article asserts that positive epistemic duties are legitimate and can lead to epistemic criticism for those who fail to believe in light of strong evidence, such as vaccine safety. [Extracted from the article]