"Stop Asking for Life to Be a Poem": On Cybernetic Instrumentality.
Published In: New Literary History, 2023, v. 54, n. 2. P. 1263 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Miller, Michael F. 3 of 3
Abstract
T he "sentimental" narrator of Hari Kunzru's Red Pill is starting to feel like a self-described "waster."1 Away on fellowship in Berlin at the interdisciplinary Deuter Center for Social and Cultural Research, our writer-in-residence narrator ingests the eponymous capsule and "wakes up" to the obsolescence of literary humanism, a historical "period that was drawing to a close" (RP 46).2 Instead of using the time afforded by the fellowship to work on his grant winning project––notunironically titled "The Lyric I," and which aims to achieve poetic transcendence through a better understanding of "the construction of the self in lyric poetry" (RP 15)––the narrator whiles away his days on violent police procedurals and social media doom-scrolling.3 "I was like a miser, fretting about his emotional hoard," he confesses: "I frequently found myself hunched over my laptop, my eyes welling with tears ... If the world changed, would I be able to protect my family?" (RP 6-7). Alternating between sentimental musings and apocalyptic fantasies, he slides into a "mad" state of internet-fueled paranoia and begins to see signs and symbols of "red pill" and Alt-Right ideology everywhere he looks (RP 280). The "sleepy-eyed cartoon frog" on a stranger's tee shirt slyly signals right-wing in-group belonging, while the OK sign made by the right hand of Carl Spitzweg's "Poor Poet" is reinterpreted as an allusion to contemporary fascist iconography, a cryptic communication from the not-so distant past (RP 27; 9-10). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:New Literary History. 2023/04, Vol. 54, Issue 2, p1263
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Religion and Philosophy
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0028-6087
- DOI:10.1353/nlh.2023.a907172
- Accession Number:172041595
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of New Literary History is the property of Johns Hopkins University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.