Cheating Engagedly Described and the Judgment-Action Gap Narrowed Widely.
Published In: Human Development (0018716X), 2024, v. 68, n. 1. P. 26 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Krettenauer, Tobias 3 of 3
Abstract
The article discusses the prevalence of academic cheating in universities, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. It highlights how online learning and assessment methods have made cheating easier and more common. The authors propose a "moral developmental" approach to studying cheating, focusing on perceptions of cheating, evaluations of cheating acts, and action selection based on moral judgments. They argue that the gap between moral judgment and action is narrower than previously assumed, primarily due to the exclusion of non-cognitive factors in the relationship between judgment and action. However, they acknowledge that concepts such as moral self and moral identity remain relevant in understanding the connection between moral judgment and action. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Human Development (0018716X). 2024/01, Vol. 68, Issue 1, p26
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Religion and Philosophy
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0018-716X
- DOI:10.1159/000535293
- Accession Number:176180787
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Human Development (0018716X) is the property of Karger AG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.