State Coercive Power and the War on Cults in China.
Published In: Communist & Post-Communist Studies, 2025, v. 58, n. 1. P. 53 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Chen, Xi; Xu, Jing 3 of 3
Abstract
As a high-capacity authoritarian regime, China has made immense efforts to exterminate the Falun Gong and other "evil cults." However, cult activities persist throughout the country. This article seeks to explain why the extensive government repression in China failed to achieve its goal of eliminating "evil cults." By examining how economic reforms in China have created a relatively safe space for illegal activities, the article highlights the importance of going beyond a focus on the conventional coercive apparatus, and adopting a broad concept of coercive capacity for understanding authoritarian durability. State penetration facilitated by grassroots institutions provides a particularly important foundation for the regime's coercive power. This study draws on a combination of quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative study analysis uses a dataset compiled from 5,852 judicial cases in which 8,785 cult activities were prosecuted. The qualitative analysis is conducted as a case study based on fieldwork in a medium-size city in Hunan province. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Communist & Post-Communist Studies. 2025/03, Vol. 58, Issue 1, p53
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Religion and Philosophy
- Publication Date:2025
- ISSN:0967-067X
- DOI:10.1525/cpcs.2024.2136353
- Accession Number:183116612
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Communist & Post-Communist Studies is the property of University of California Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.