JOURNAL ARTICLE

Bentham, O'Connell and the Failure of Radical Politics of Law Reform, 1828–1831.

  • Published In: English Historical Review, 2025, v. 140, n. 603. P. 398 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Li, Cheng 3 of 3

Abstract

This article analyzes the tactical alliance between the English philosopher and law reformer Jeremy Bentham and the Irish Catholic political leader Daniel O'Connell from 1828 to 1831, focusing on their collaboration to promote radical legal reforms including codification, judicial administration, and the establishment of an Equity Dispatch Court. Bentham actively provided O'Connell with petitions and legal proposals, while O'Connell’s support fluctuated according to his broader political negotiations with Whig and Tory parties and his need to maintain influence for Irish interests. Although O'Connell publicly embraced Bentham’s utilitarian law reform rhetoric to bolster his radical reputation, his commitment waned as political circumstances shifted, especially with the rise of the Whigs and their offers of patronage. The alliance ultimately dissolved due to conflicting reform priorities and political strategies, illustrating how O'Connell’s pragmatic considerations shaped his engagement with Bentham’s reform agenda.

Additional Information

  • Source:English Historical Review. 2025/04, Vol. 140, Issue 603, p398
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Religion and Philosophy
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0013-8266
  • DOI:10.1093/ehr/ceae237
  • Accession Number:186630276
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of English Historical Review is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.