Back

Natural Theology.

  • Published In: Reviews in Religion & Theology, 2023, v. 30, n. 1. P. 104 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Anderson, Owen 3 of 3

Abstract

This has created ambiguities, damaged natural theology and undermined the claim that unbelief is a sin for which we need Christ (if everyone knows God, no one is in unbelief). After examining the definitions of "God" and "know", we can assess whether Vos has demonstrated that there is a clear general revelation of God. When we consider the Trinity, we still use this definition of God knowable from general revelation (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are all God, as defined in Q4). [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Reviews in Religion & Theology. 2023/01, Vol. 30, Issue 1, p104
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Religion and Philosophy
  • Publication Date:2023
  • ISSN:1350-7303
  • DOI:10.1111/rirt.14224
  • Accession Number:162995932
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Reviews in Religion & Theology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.