Some wars are rational.
Published In: Political Quarterly, 2023, v. 94, n. 4. P. 689 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Roberts, Geoffrey 3 of 3
Abstract
In the book "How States Think: The Rationality of Foreign Policy" by John Mearsheimer and Sebastian Rosato, the authors argue that most states act rationally most of the time. They believe that rational state action is the result of theory-driven deliberative processes that lead to decisions based on credible theories. The authors provide case studies, primarily focusing on the World Wars and the Cold War, to support their argument. However, some critics argue that the authors overlook the role of affective factors and ideology in decision-making processes. The book also examines the US decision to invade Iraq in 2003 as a case of non-rational decision making. Overall, the book aims to explore the predominance of rationality in international politics and its implications for decision makers. [Extracted from the article]
Additional Information
- Source:Political Quarterly. 2023/10, Vol. 94, Issue 4, p689
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Religion and Philosophy
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0032-3179
- DOI:10.1111/1467-923X.13318
- Accession Number:174065498
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Political Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.