Back

Looking Back and Moving Forward: Historical Lessons for Current Research on Moral Development.

  • Published In: Human Development (0018716X), 2024, v. 68, n. 3. P. 103 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Turiel, Elliot 3 of 3

Abstract

A history of research on the development of morality yields valuable lessons. In 1932, Piaget examined children's moral judgments, proposing that actions feedback on judgments, which in turn feedback on actions. He analyzed children's entry into the moral realm through a sense of obligation. Subsequently, Kohlberg proposed a sequence entailing differentiations of justice from non-moral considerations, emphasizing epistemology, and how one level of development is more adequate than prior levels. The Piaget and Kohlberg differentiation models of development have not held up to subsequent evidence; young children distinguish morality from social conventions as well as from the domain of personal jurisdiction. History points to issues requiring further analyses. These include expositions of children's entry into the moral domain; developmental transformations and the bases for greater adequacy; interrelations between judgments and actions; and connections between judgments and emotions, including study of on-going, background dispositions labeled sentiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Human Development (0018716X). 2024/05, Vol. 68, Issue 3, p103
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Religion and Philosophy
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0018-716X
  • DOI:10.1159/000539407
  • Accession Number:178911190
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Human Development (0018716X) is the property of Karger AG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.