Conveying depression: Is a reduced relative preference for happiness a way depressed people convince themselves of their depressed identity?
Published In: Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 2024, v. 43, n. 3. P. 227 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Wahlers, Justin N.; Wahlers, Danielle E.; Hart, William P. 3 of 3
Abstract
Introduction: Individuals who are more depressed show a reduced preference for happy over sad stimuli. Researchers have proffered various features of depression that might produce a genuine reduced preference for happy vs. sad stimuli. Here, in line with an identity maintenance perspective on depression, we posited that this reduced relative preference is, in part, used to communicate a more depressed identity. Method: In a preregistered experiment, nonclinical participants (N = 508) completed a dimensional measure of depression and rated their preferences for happy and sad images. We manipulated the extent to which a relative preference for happy (vs. sad) images could be used to seem depressed (happy-preference-is-depressed preference framing) or vice versa (sad-preference-is-depressed preference framing). Results: People with elevated depression showed a reduced preference for happy over sad images in the sad-vs. happy-preference-is-depressed preference framing, and people with low depression showed the opposite effect. These effects persisted after controlling for sex and could not be attributed to demand. Depression also related positively to rating oneself as being depressed, and mediation evidence suggested that the strategic alteration of preferences on the image viewing task partly drove these judgments. Discussion: Consistent with an identity maintenance perspective, the data suggest that hedonic preferences associated with depression may be driven, in part, by the desire to signal one's own depression levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology. 2024/06, Vol. 43, Issue 3, p227
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Religion and Philosophy
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0736-7236
- DOI:10.1521/jscp.2024.43.3.227
- Accession Number:177635693
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology is the property of Guilford Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.