JOURNAL ARTICLE

Examination of the permeability of rubberized concrete with different water/cement ratios and their resistance against acid and sulfate attack.

  • Published In: Progress in Rubber, Plastics & Recycling Technology, 2024, v. 40, n. 3. P. 320 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Kandil, Ufuk; Bulut, H Alperen 3 of 3

Abstract

This article investigates the permeability and durability of rubberized concrete incorporating recycled waste rubber in three grain sizes (chips, crumb, powder) at varying replacement ratios (0%–24%) of fine and coarse aggregates, with water/cement (w/c) ratios of 0.4 and 0.5. Tests on sorptivity, electrical resistivity, and resistance to acid and sulfate attacks after 90 days of curing revealed that rubber substitution generally increased capillary water absorption but improved electrical resistivity at optimal rubber contents (notably 12% at w/c 0.4). Rubberized concretes with 16% waste rubber showed significantly reduced compressive strength loss under acid and sulfate attacks compared to control samples, with higher w/c ratios (0.5) enhancing resistance to these aggressive environments. The study highlights that both the water/cement ratio and the proportion of waste rubber are critical parameters influencing the durability and permeability of rubberized concrete, suggesting ideal rubber substitution levels between 12% and 16%.

Additional Information

  • Source:Progress in Rubber, Plastics & Recycling Technology. 2024/08, Vol. 40, Issue 3, p320
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Science
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:1477-7606
  • DOI:10.1177/14777606231224132
  • Accession Number:178804503
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Progress in Rubber, Plastics & Recycling Technology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.