Back

Differential absorption of circularly polarized light by a centrosymmetric crystal.

  • Published In: Science, 2025, v. 388, n. 6752. P. 1194 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Parrish, Katherine A.; Salij, Andrew; Kamp, Kendall R.; Smith, Evan; Utama, M. Iqbal Bakti; Bergsten, Anders J.; Czerwinski, Rachel; Smith, Mackinsey A.; Hersam, Mark C.; Poeppelmeier, Kenneth R.; Goldsmith, Randall H.; Tempelaar, Roel 3 of 3

Abstract

Crystalline solids are governed by universal structure-property relationships derived from their crystal symmetry, leading to paradigmatic rules on what properties they can and cannot exhibit. A long-held structure-property relationship is that centrosymmetric crystals cannot differentially absorb circularly polarized light. In this study, we demonstrate the design, synthesis, and characterization of the centrosymmetric material Li2Co3(SeO3)4, which violates this relationship not by defying symmetry-imposed selection rules but by invoking a photophysical process not previously characterized for crystalline solids. This process originates from an interference between linear dichroism and linear birefringence, referred to as LD-LB, and involves strong chiroptical signals that invert upon sample flipping. In addition to enabling a chiroptical response under centrosymmetry, this process opens up photonic engineering opportunities based on crystalline solids. Editor's summary: For nearly two centuries, chemists have relied on absorption and rotation of polarized light to distinguish chiral compounds, so much so that the term "optically active" is often used synonymously with the structural absence of mirror or inversion symmetry. Parrish et al. now report that a particular centrosymmetric crystalline solid, a lithium cobalt selenium oxide compound, can nonetheless differentially absorb circularly polarized light. They explain the observation as an interference effect between linear dichroism and linear birefringence, and they derive the general symmetry requirements distinguishing the response from conventional optical activity. —Jake S. Yeston [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Science. 2025/06, Vol. 388, Issue 6752, p1194
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Science
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:0036-8075
  • DOI:10.1126/science.adr5478
  • Accession Number:188104075
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.