JOURNAL ARTICLE
Insectivorous bat foraging tracks the availability of aquatic flies (Diptera).
Published In: Journal of Wildlife Management, 2023, v. 87, n. 5. P. 1 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Metcalfe, Anya N.; Fritzinger, Carol A.; Weller, Theodore J.; Dodrill, Michael J.; Muehlbauer, Jeffrey D.; Yackulic, Charles B.; Holton, P. Brandon; Szydlo, Cheyenne M.; Durning, Laura E.; Sankey, Joel B.; Kennedy, Theodore A. 3 of 3
Abstract
Rivers and their adjacent riparian zones are model ecosystems for observing cross‐ecosystem energy transfers. Aquatic insects emerging from streams, for example, are resource subsidies that support riparian consumers such as birds, spiders, lizards, and bats. We collaborated with recreational river runners in Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA, to record acoustic bat activity and sample riparian insects using light traps at dusk from April through October 2017–2020. River runners collected these data on 1,428 events over 611 sampling nights at 410 sites throughout a 470‐km segment of the Colorado River. We documented 71 insect taxa in light traps and recorded 19 bat species with acoustic detectors. We hypothesized that bat activity along this highly regulated river segment would be influenced primarily by variation in prey availability, as compared to other habitat descriptors. We predicted that bat activity would be positively related to aquatic insect catch rates and unrelated to terrestrial insect abundance. We fit Bayesian regression models to test these hypotheses and to quantify the relationship between bat activity and a suite of environmental variables: time of year, time of day, distance from perennial tributaries, distance from rapids, channel width, geomorphic reach, tall vegetation cover, air temperature, and lunar phase. Bat activity was positively related to the abundance of aquatic flies (Diptera), which outcompeted all other prey categories and structural habitat descriptors in our models. Within our dusk sampling period, activity of small myotis (California myotis [Myotis californicus] and Yuma myotis [M. yumanensis]) was high late in the evening and canyon bats (Parastrellus hesperus), conversely, were more active early in the evening. Activity of canyon bats varied seasonally, with peak activity in August. Our results support the hypothesis that aquatic prey, specifically aquatic flies, are key predictors of bat activity along a large, regulated river corridor and demonstrate the power of community science as a tool for ecosystem monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Wildlife Management. 2023/07, Vol. 87, Issue 5, p1
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Science
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0022-541X
- DOI:10.1002/jwmg.22414
- Accession Number:164093461
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Wildlife Management is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.