Back

The relationship between pellet size and shotgun dispersion patterns.

  • Published In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, v. 69, n. 2. P. 461 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Kerkhoff, Wim; Maitimu, Keanu; Pater, K. Dieter H.; de Jong, Markus A. 3 of 3

Abstract

When reconstructing a shooting incident with a shotgun, the muzzle‐to‐target distance can be determined by relating the size of a dispersion pattern found on a crime scene to that of test shots. Ideally, the test shots are performed with the weapon and ammunition that were used in the incident. But sometimes examiners will have to resort to alternatives, such as using cartridges of the same brand and type but with another pellet size. For this reason, the relationship between pellet size and shotgun dispersion patterns was studied with both lead and steel shotgun pellets. Cartridges were loaded with identical cartridge cases, powder charges, and wads but with different pellet sizes, below size B. The cartridges were fired, and the dispersion patterns at 5 m in front of the muzzle were measured and compared. The results provide strong support for the proposition that shotgun dispersion patterns with both lead and steel shot increase with decreasing pellet size if all other relevant parameters are kept equal. The results also provide an indicative measure of the magnitude of the effect. Pattern sizes were approximately 1.7 times larger with #9 than with #0 lead shot and 1.4 times larger with #9 than with #1 steel shot. The differences between consecutive shot sizes were generally smaller. This means that cartridges of equal brand and type but with the next nearest shot number can be used for a muzzle‐to‐target distance determination, keeping the information of the current study in mind in the final interpretation of the results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2024/03, Vol. 69, Issue 2, p461
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Science
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:0022-1198
  • DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.15427
  • Accession Number:175870051
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Forensic Sciences is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.