Development and validation of a new tool for assessment of trainees' interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound skills.

  • Published In: Rheumatology, 2025, v. 64, n. 2. P. 484 1 of 3

  • Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3

  • Authored By: Carstensen, Stine Maya Dreier; Just, Søren Andreas; Pfeiffer-Jensen, Mogens; Østergaard, Mikkel; Konge, Lars; Terslev, Lene 3 of 3

Abstract

Objectives Interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) procedures are routinely performed in rheumatology practice. However, the efficacy and safety of the procedures rely on the competence of the physician, and assessment of skills is crucial. Thus, this study aimed to develop and establish validity evidence for a tool assessing trainees' interventional MSUS skills. Methods An expert panel of rheumatologists modified an existing tool for assessing competences in invasive abdominal and thoracic ultrasound procedures. The new tool (the Assessment of Interventional Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Skills [AIMUS] tool) reflects the essential steps in interventional MSUS. To establish validity evidence, physicians with different levels of interventional MSUS experience were enrolled and performed two procedures on a rubber phantom, simulating real patient cases. All performances were video-recorded, anonymized and assessed in random order by two blinded raters using the AIMUS tool. Results 65 physicians from 21 different countries were included and categorized into groups based on their experience, resulting in 130 videos for analysis. The internal consistency of the tool was excellent, with a Cronbach's α of 0.96. The inter-case reliability was good with a Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.74 and the inter-rater reliability was moderate to good (PCC 0.58). The ability to discriminate between different levels of experience was highly significant (P  < 0.001). Conclusion We have developed and established validity evidence for a new interventional MSUS assessment tool. The tool can be applied in future competency-based educational programmes, provide structured feedback to trainees in daily clinical practice and ensure end-of-training competence. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT05303974. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additional Information

  • Source:Rheumatology. 2025/02, Vol. 64, Issue 2, p484
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Science
  • Publication Date:2025
  • ISSN:1462-0324
  • DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keae050
  • Accession Number:182905186
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Rheumatology is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.