Effects of a low‐velocity fluvial environment on saw mark evidence in bone.
Published In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, v. 68, n. 1. P. 35 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Grosso, Alicia R.; Volney, Tyra L. 3 of 3
Abstract
Saws are common tools used in postmortem dismemberment to alter human remains. Dismemberment may coincide with other concealment methods such as disposal in aquatic environments, so forensic anthropologists must recognize how taphonomy affects saw mark preservation. This study focuses on exposure of saw cut bone to a fluvial environment. Cross sections from pig humeri cut by a 7 TPI saw were evaluated on all cut surfaces for tooth hop (TH), exit chipping, and breakaway spurs. Pre‐fluvial exposure, features were measured by two observers using a stereomicroscope while a one‐dimensional profilometer was used to define surface roughness. Bones were randomly assigned to control or experimental groups and within each divided by duration of exposure (24, 48, 72, and 96 h). Control groups (four cross sections) were exposed to water in a 3‐meter‐long hydraulic channel; experimental groups (20 cross sections) were exposed to water and sediment in a 12‐meter‐long sediment‐recirculating hydraulic channel. Velocity was maintained at 0.45 m/s. All measurements were repeated post‐exposure. Observer A recorded 268 TH (mean: 3.70 ± 0.34 mm); post‐exposure, count increased by 16.79% (mean: 3.71 ± 0.29 mm). Observer B recorded 247 TH (mean: 3.46 ± 0.42 mm); post‐exposure, count decreased by 29.15% (mean: 3.36 ± 0.33 mm). All TPI estimates calculated include the 7 TPI saw. Exit chipping lost flakiness (in both channels), but was still visible. Breakaway spurs were not visibly altered. Surface staining was limited to bones exposed to sediment. Roughness was significantly lower in experimental groups post‐fluvial exposure (W = 5705, p < 0.05). Overall, this fluvial environment did not obliterate saw mark evidence from bone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2023/01, Vol. 68, Issue 1, p35
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Science
- Publication Date:2023
- ISSN:0022-1198
- DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.15170
- Accession Number:161030006
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Forensic Sciences is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.