Forced to be a good citizen: Exploring the bright‐ and dark‐side effects of daily compulsory citizenship behaviours on subsequent proactive helping and interpersonal deviance.
Published In: Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 2024, v. 97, n. 2. P. 647 1 of 3
Database: Academic Search Ultimate 2 of 3
Authored By: Chi, Nai‐Wen; Lin, Chieh‐Yu; Bruning, Patrick F.; Hung, Yu 3 of 3
Abstract
Compulsory citizenship behaviour (CCB) refers to extra‐role behaviours that are not necessarily voluntary or driven by goodwill, and are often conducted under duress or performed in response to supervisor or coworker pressure. The literature is currently unclear about whether these behaviours have negative, positive, or a nuanced combination of outcomes. We address this confusion by drawing on Conservation of Resources Theory to explain employees' daily depletion and organization‐based self‐esteem (OBSE) mechanisms that capture respective costs and benefits of daily CCB. We also explain how employees' extraversion and leader–member exchange (LMX) are critical boundary conditions of these effects. Using an experience sampling method, we collected data twice per day from 186 full‐time employees across 10 working days, yielding 1551 valid daily responses. The results of multilevel path analyses showed that: (a) daily CCB had a positive indirect effect on next‐day interpersonal deviance via increased ego depletion, with extraversion buffering this positive indirect effect; and (b) daily CCB had a positive indirect effect on next‐day proactive helping via increased OBSE, with LMX strengthening this positive indirect effect. These results suggest that employees' daily CCB has both costs (i.e., resource depletion) and benefits (i.e., positive self‐focused beliefs). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Additional Information
- Source:Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology. 2024/06, Vol. 97, Issue 2, p647
- Document Type:Article
- Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
- Publication Date:2024
- ISSN:0963-1798
- DOI:10.1111/joop.12486
- Accession Number:176870141
- Copyright Statement:Copyright of Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.