JOURNAL ARTICLE

AUTHENTICATING VIDEO EVIDENCE IN THE AGE OF AI — Mooney v. State Sets Precedent, but AI Concerns Loom Large.

  • Published In: Maryland Bar Journal, 2024, v. 6, n. 2. P. 58 1 of 3

  • Database: Legal Source 2 of 3

  • Authored By: ARACRI, COLLEEN 3 of 3

Abstract

The article from the Maryland Bar Journal discusses the authentication of video evidence in the context of artificial intelligence (AI). It highlights the Mooney v. State case, where video evidence was authenticated through witness testimony and circumstantial evidence. The article also addresses concerns about AI-altered video evidence and the challenges it poses for authentication in legal proceedings. Additionally, it mentions a proposal to revise the standards for admissible AI evidence to ensure reliability and transparency. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Maryland Bar Journal. 2024/09, Vol. 6, Issue 2, p58
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Publication Date:2024
  • ISSN:00254177
  • Accession Number:184455432
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Maryland Bar Journal is the property of Maryland State Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.