JOURNAL ARTICLE

Disrupting the "wrong" target? Climate protest tactics affecting entities deemed undeserving are perceived as immoral, unjust, and reduce activist support.

  • Published In: Psychology & Psychiatry Journal, 2026. P. 169 1 of 2

  • Database: Psychology Source 2 of 2

Abstract

This article focuses on research examining public reactions to disruptive climate protests by organizations such as Extinction Rebellion, Just Stop Oil, and The Last Generation. The studies, conducted with participants from the US and UK, found that protests targeting entities perceived as less responsible for climate change—such as cultural institutions or the general public—were judged as less moral, provoked more anger, and received less support compared to protests aimed at entities seen as more responsible, like fossil fuel companies or governments. The findings suggest that directing protest tactics toward targets deemed more deserving of blame may reduce public backlash. This research is based on a preprint that has not yet undergone peer review. [Extracted from the article]

Additional Information

  • Source:Psychology & Psychiatry Journal. 2026/04, p169
  • Document Type:Article
  • Subject Area:Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Publication Date:2026
  • ISSN:1944-2718
  • Accession Number:192887123
  • Copyright Statement:Copyright of Psychology & Psychiatry Journal is the property of NewsRx and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Looking to go deeper into this topic? Look for more articles on EBSCOhost.